The three buckets — Teaching, Research, Administrative — with specific dos and don'ts.
At UMD, we are collectively responsible for maintaining intellectual honesty and scholarly integrity, both of which could be compromised by presenting GenAI-generated content as one's own work. Faculty, staff, and student-employees should use UMD-approved GenAI tools, such as TerpAI when working and teaching on behalf of UMD. GenAI tools should not be used to fabricate, falsify, or misrepresent information, impersonate individuals, or generate deceptive content except when intentionally employed by instructors or researchers for pedagogical or research purposes in a controlled and ethical manner.
They should also be aware that accepting click-through agreements using UMD credentials without delegated signature authority may result in personal responsibility for compliance with the terms and conditions of the AI tool. UMD strongly recommends that all students utilize UMD-approved tools for study, as they are deployed in alignment with institutional security and compliance requirements.
1. Teaching and Learning
Instructors are strongly encouraged to establish a course-specific policy that defines the appropriate and inappropriate use of GenAI tools. Students should assume that the use of GenAI tools to complete course assignments and assessments is not allowed unless otherwise specified in the course syllabus or assignment/assessment instructions. While using GenAI tools as a learning aid—such as for practicing problems, exploring concepts, or reviewing definitions—is a common practice, students should confer with their instructors about academic integrity policies within their particular courses and assignments.
Students — Students should consult with their instructors, teaching assistants, and mentors to clarify expectations regarding the use of GenAI tools in a given course. When permitted by the instructor, students should appropriately acknowledge and cite their use of GenAI applications. When conducting research-related activities (e.g., theses, comprehensive exams, dissertations), students should refer to the guidance below for research and scholarship. Allegations of unauthorized use of GenAI will be treated similarly to allegations of unauthorized assistance (cheating) or plagiarism and investigated by the Office of Student Conduct.
Faculty and Instructors — Instructors are encouraged to help students develop critical thinking skills about the use of GenAI tools, fostering workforce readiness and preparing them to navigate the technology-rich world we all inhabit. This can be achieved through class discussions, assignments, or by incorporating the AI Literacy module developed by the Teaching and Learning Transformation Center and University Libraries into ELMS-Canvas course spaces.
It will be at the course instructor's discretion to determine whether GenAI may be used, to what extent, and for which assignments and assessments. Instructors are strongly encouraged to establish a course-specific policy that defines the appropriate and inappropriate use of GenAI tools, fostering transparency and understanding between instructors and students. These expectations should be clearly outlined in the course syllabus (see suggested language), shared through relevant course policies, and reinforced during class discussions. Explicit and transparent decisions about limiting or integrating GenAI tools into coursework can strengthen students' understanding of academic integrity while promoting meaningful learning.
If using GenAI to create course materials or assist in grading processes, instructors are advised to use the same level of oversight and transparency they would expect of students using these tools in their academic work.
The Division of Academic Affairs advises against incorporating GenAI detection tools into course policies. However, if an instructor plans to use such tools, they should clearly communicate to students the reasons for their use and how they will be interpreted and acted on. Results from GenAI detection tools should be treated only as potential indicators of misconduct, not definitive proof. These results should not serve as the sole basis for grading decisions. While information from these tools may be included in referrals to the Office of Student Conduct, such information alone will not solely determine a student's responsibility. GenAI detection tools may expose students' information to third parties without proper authorization, potentially violating FERPA, other privacy laws, or institutional policies. This risk persists even if an individual's name is removed from an assignment. Faculty should exercise caution about inputting student work into these tools. For guidance on GenAI and de-identification, contact the Privacy Office at umd-privacy@umd.edu.
Teaching Assistants (TAs), Graders, and Tutors — TAs, graders, and tutors must ensure alignment with instructors and/or program-specific guidance regarding the use of GenAI tools within a given course. They should adhere to the instructors' and/or programs' expectations regarding whether, how, and when students may use GenAI tools. TAs, Graders, and Tutors should only use GenAI to assist students, create course materials, and grade assignments with the instructor's approval. They are advised to use the same level of oversight and transparency expected of instructors using GenAI tools.
2. Research and Scholarship
Researchers are encouraged to consult with co-investigators, advisors, collaborators, funding agencies, and field experts to evaluate the appropriateness of using GenAI technology in research activities.
Maintaining research integrity and safeguarding intellectual property, confidentiality, and ethical standards are essential when using GenAI tools. All users should review and evaluate the output for accuracy and potential bias and should disclose the use of GenAI with proper attribution.
Researchers should follow specific policies set by journals, funding agencies, and professional societies when reporting research. Many federal agencies use tools to detect AI-generated content, as GenAI tools often paraphrase from other sources, raising concerns regarding plagiarism and intellectual property. Researchers should take extra caution before inputting confidential, proprietary, or sensitive data classified as high risk (Level 3) or higher into GenAI tools, even those approved by UMD. If you are uncertain, it is advisable to consult the DIT Privacy Office by contacting umd-privacy@umd.edu.
Researchers should not input federal, state, or UMD data into externally sourced GenAI tools due to the high risk of exposing sensitive information to public or open-source domains. They should also avoid using GenAI-automated meeting tools to record or capture discussions involving sensitive data or topics. If unsure about the recording practices of external hosts, vendors, or subcontractors, researchers should seek clarification to ensure compliance and appropriateness. If a host insists on using GenAI-automated tools despite concerns, UMD researchers are advised to decline participation to protect institutional data integrity and privacy.
Externally sourced GenAI tools remain subject to the State of Maryland and UMD procurement policies and procedures. Researchers should not upload unpublished research data or other confidential information into GenAI tools that have not undergone proper review. Entering information into tools that have not been reviewed and authorized may compromise future intellectual property protections, lead to unauthorized disclosure of research data, and/or create privacy violations for research subjects or collaborators. Confidential materials, such as unpublished manuscripts, funding proposals under peer review, or personal information about research subjects, should not be shared with GenAI tools. For instance, uploading interview data could result in quotations or sensitive information being inadvertently made public.
Researchers should exercise caution, as AI-generated outputs may infringe on third-party intellectual property rights. GenAI responses are derived from preexisting works, and their use in research may require additional scrutiny to avoid legal or ethical conflicts. For research that may result in invention, the US Patent and Trademark Office recognizes AI-assisted inventions, and patent protection may be sought where one or more persons have made a significant contribution to the invention.
All research at UMD is subject to institutional policies, including the UMD Policy on Intellectual Property, the Policy on Copyrights, the UMD Code of Academic Integrity, Policy and Procedures Concerning Scholarly Misconduct, and the Policy on Conflict of Interest and Conflict of Commitment. Researchers should familiarize themselves with these and all related policies, which can be accessed through institutional websites.
3. Administrative Work
GenAI tools are encouraged to enhance work efficiency and productivity. However, their use should align with institutional policies, safeguard sensitive information, and ensure outputs are accurate, unbiased, and appropriate for the intended purpose.
In addition to the above guidance for teaching, learning, research, and scholarship, GenAI tools may also be utilized for administrative purposes, including, but not limited to, streamlining workflows, assisting with business processes, drafting communications, and assembling information to inform decision-making. When leveraging GenAI for administrative tasks, ensuring full compliance with privacy standards and all relevant institutional policies, standards, and guidelines is essential. Administrative staff should not input any institutional data that is not publicly available into externally sourced platforms (free or paid) using GenAI tools. This restriction applies to any confidential or proprietary business information belonging to UMD. In such cases, administrative staff must rely exclusively on UMD-approved GenAI tools, such as TerpAI, which are deployed in alignment with institutional security and compliance requirements. While conducting work on behalf of UMD, faculty, and staff should not input institutional data classified as moderate risk (Level 2) or higher into publicly available/externally sourced platforms (free or paid) using GenAI tools.
The use of GenAI tools for administrative purposes must also align with unit-specific guidance to ensure consistency with operational and legal standards. Before integrating GenAI tools into their work processes, individuals must consult with their supervisors to discuss appropriate use in their specific roles, clarify expectations, and determine the scope of permissible applications. Furthermore, any AI-generated content in official communications, documents, or reports should be disclosed and appropriately attributed.
To promote transparency and accountability in using administrative applications of GenAI, individuals should ensure that AI-generated outputs meet quality and accuracy standards before using or distributing them. Retaining records of AI-generated drafts or outputs is recommended, particularly when assembling information to inform decision-making or drafting external communications.
